Things are going to work a little differently this year on
the blog. Because I’m currently writing for Razzball,
FanDuel
Insider, as well as your sorry asses, I am unfortunately going to have to
limit the size of the posts I do here. I will still put the time and effort
into the CPP to ensure that the rankings themselves are fool-proof, but the
actual write-ups will likely be shorter. It will vary from week-to-week and
even from team-to-team depending on what else I have going on, but fear not,
every team will get touched on every week. Yes, even you New Gutman. On the
bright side for all of you, Bitching About Kicking will no longer be included
this year, as I think we can all agree that kickers are worthless and
unpredictable. Having said that, Nate Kaeding’s 18 points are the reason I am
in first place overall after one week. So I have that going for me, which is
nice.
The CPP will remain the revamped, more objective scoring
system that it switched to in the middle of last season. The biggest change is
how injuries are handled. Previously I gave each team a point for each injured
starter, and accumulated those over the course of the season. This year, I’ll
be taking the average amount of points those players scored over the last 4
weeks, and subtracting the points scored by his replacement. This results in
injuries meaning nothing in Week 1, taking out possible CPP-boosters in Ryan
Mathews, Mendenhall, etc., and also means that when a guy has been out for more
than a month, you no longer receive “credit” for his injury. At that time you
will have had enough time to replace him in your lineup via trade or free
agency.
The other factors all remain the same: Adjusted PPG
(removing the highest and lowest weekly score after Week 5), Cumulative
Difference Between Actual and Optimal Lineup, Roster Moves, Weekly Consistency,
and Actual Wins (times finishing in the top 7 in the league in points each
week). For the first week or two, things like Points Scored and Points Left On
Bench will skew things a bit, but after that it will even out to give some
accurate Power Rankings of the Teams and Owners in this league.
Without further ado, the first CPP Rankings of 2012:
Week 1 Rankings
1. AGD – CPP: 131
The story of your team all year will be Peyton. If he plays
well, you should get 20 points from your QB, and Demaryius should produce as
well. If he’s banged up, you essentially lose two starters. So far so good.
2. Kumpf – CPP: 120
I’m gonna jump on the Trade Campaign bandwagon that Barnard
and Weissbard started yesterday. My goal this year was to assemble depth, and
after one week it looks like I succeeded, so if you want to deal let me know. Now if only Brady would start breaking
20 points I’ll be in great shape.
3. Joseph – CPP: 112
You might be up here this week, but with the 30 combined
points from your kicker and defense, you’ll need more help from you actual
lineup if you want to stay here. Your combo of Rice and Lynch should be
formidable every week, and you might have something there in Randy Moss.
4. Weissbard – CPP: 109
The standings might not recognize your team as winning, but
the CPP does. You also got a ton of points from your kicker and D, but I like
your lineup overall. It might be bittersweet rooting for Romo each week, but if
Ogletree is even somewhat legit, then he’s got the weapons to be ELIte. At some point your stable of
mediocre RBs should pay off in a trade as well.
5. New Gutman – CPP: 107
Your terrible team name didn’t pay off, as no one beat Off
in the Shower (though I have yet to confirm this with Alan). You could use
some of Weissbard’s aforementioned mediocrity at RB, as you have nothing after
MJD. I like your starting receivers, but with Jennings banged up this week,
you’ll be hurting there as well. I guess lack of depth is one of the problems
with not showing up to the draft.
6. Ajay – CPP: 104
Going into the season, I liked your team more than anyone
else’s and I’m not even that high on Matty Ice. Week 1 showed that you are
absolutely a legit contender, as you won with ease even while AP was on your
bench. If Cruz can start catching the ball and Reggie doesn’t succumb to the
horror movie that is the 2012 Miami Dolphins, I think you’ll steadily move up
this list.
7. Esco – CPP: 97.6
Kaeding’s MNF explosion made the benching of RG3 more
palatable for you I’m sure. Your perceived depth at WR was actually your
weakness, as none of them hit double figures. I see a trade in your future, as
Kevin Smith will inevitably get hurt, and your backups are worth next to
nothing.
8. Billy – CPP: 91.5
Your bench is an absolute mess, which I attribute to you
being wasted for the last two weeks, but I do like your starters. Nothing
spectacular, but you’ll be solid every week. I had a team like that last year
before losing my QB, and it keeps you in every matchup but ultimately won’t
lead you too far once you suffer an injury.
9. Bennett – CPP: 82.4
You rectified your QB mess pretty quickly, and while New
Gutman trade raped the shit out of you, getting AJ Green isn’t a bad haul. Losing
Fred Jackson for two months, however, is a different story. What hurts even more is that somehow the
third RB on your team is someone named Dion Lewis. You really fucked up your
roster during the draft, but it’s not too late to fix it. Until then, you'll continue
to extend your record-breaking 13-game losing streak.
10. Zacherman – CPP: 74.2
I’m sure you’ll flip a shit about this ranking, and after
that incoherent email last night I’m not so sure you haven’t lost your mind
already, but more than half your lineup was in single digits and it took a
vintage performance from the Jets D to win you your matchup. The best news of
your Week 1 is that both Ridley and Flacco looked legit and give you more depth
than I originally thought you had.
11. Donnie – CPP: 73.7
Plain and simple, DeAngelo Williams fucked you. He fucked you man. With no
J-Stew, he should have feasted on Tampa’s D, and he barely broke even. The
toughest choice you’ll have each week is between Meachem and Malcom Floyd, and
I don’t envy you on that one. As always, your TEs are strong though so you’ll
be competitive if you start the right lineup.
12. Alan – CPP: 67.2
It’s unfortunate that Alfred Morris tore shit up for me,
because Garcon’s performance could have swung our trade in your direction. I’m
not sure why Tate didn’t do better, but I think he’s unfortunately your best
choice at RB2. Your season will hinge on the performances of Stafford and
Welker, who you drastically overpaid for, and who both sucked ass last week.
13. Barnard – CPP: 55.9
I truly love when you’re in last place, but I think Kimmel
may go wire-to-wire on that one this year. The worst part about your
performance last week, is that you likely wasted Gore’s best game and a
winnable matchup when the rest of your team didn’t show up. You’ll have a tough
call at QB and WR2 each week, as well as who to flex, so the CPP won’t be kind
to you when you pick wrong.
14. Kimmel – CPP: 53.8
You spent 60% of your budget on 3 RBs who combined for 75
rushing yards in Week 1. That about sums it up. Your team is actually very
intriguing because, if you want to win a game, you’ll have to make a trade.
Selling Rodgers or CJ for multiple pieces is really the only way you can
compete. Unless you think Stephen Hill and James Jones are legitimate starting
WRs, and in that case, you deserve the team you have.
No comments:
Post a Comment